[Cadre-politics] From Felicia RE: status: Parker 2007
Dan MacNeil
dan at thecsl.org
Fri Jan 4 22:39:29 EST 2008
Felicia's note got discarded as she's not a subscriber to
cadre-politics.
#########
Subject: RE: status: Parker 2007
From: "Sullivan, Felicia" <Felicia_Sullivan at uml.edu>
Dan,
Sorry to hear the disappointing news. I'm cc'ing everyone (who
may or may not be intersted), because as someone who also runs a
small, shoestring tech-related NPO
(www.organizerscollaborative.org), I (andour founder) too have
had many conversations with funders like this.
Questions of sustainability and impact always seem to be of concern.
Even after nearly a decade of doing the work we do, serving
thousands of individuals and hundreds of organizations, our
operating budget is still under $75K. We only have a 1/2 time ED
and yet there is passion for our work and we accomplish a lot
with little.
The CSL seems in a similar place and I think some of the
disconnect is that for those who fund techie projects something
like the MVHub may not be sexy or hip enough (I know we have that
problem at OC). And for those who fund community-based programs,
it is often difficult to truly understand what really is required
in terms of talent and resources to make something like the MVHub
thrive on the technical side. As you know, software development
is extremely expensive and in a market like this, the ability to
get someone like Josh at $50K is a steal. I also think
the kind of philosophy that pushes forth the open source software
community is not understood well within the general culture.
What I suggest, is that you perhaps talk to some folks who seem
to have high visibility in doing this work and may be able to
help (along with Jericho Road) in fleshing out your plans. I am
thinking of folks like Michelle Murrian (www.nosi.net), Laura
Quinn (www.idealware.org), and Alan Gunn
(www.aspirationtech.org). Yet still, none of them actually
develop software that they are trying to get support for. Given
that the MVHub does not benefit from having a large open source
community working on the code, the ability to get the development
paid for I think will continue to prove to be difficult. OC has
been struggling with this for over seven years and the CivicLab
folks (who are much bigger with a larger OS community are still
struggling).
At OC we have also run into funders who don't want to fund our
software development because we only have the one project. You
might want to talk to David Guilhefe
and pick his brain about the frustration of financially
supporting a project like CiviCRM. I'm sure Rich Cowan (OC
founder) would have much to share as well.
It also seems to me that you are missing an opportunity to have
folks who have benefited from the MVHub to kick in support via a
grassroots fundraising campaign. OC generates about 20% of its
budget each year from fundraising appeals. You might also want
to think about what sorts of real value consulting services you
think you could offer that might generate enough money to cover
both the consulting time and contribute to overhead. For
instance, Emily (whose cc'd here) is in conversations
with Rich about customizing the Organizers' Database for CBA.
While the software is free, these consulting gigs each
contribute at least 15% to 25% of their profit back to the
organization. Organizations are willing to pay for things they
believe have value. Also, David Kronenberg was helpful this past
summer at the OC conference in suggesting a way to identify a big
ticket donor / patron / angel who would provide significant funds
to support your work. The Progressive Technology Project
(www.progressivetech.org), Grassroots.org, and the Tech
Foundation (http://www.techfoundation.org) all are supported in
this way. This may be where a combination of the GLCF and
Jericho Road may assist too.
So, apologies for this long post. Just wanted to share my
perspective with you (and others who may be intersted). For my
own selfish reason,
I too am intersted in figuring these sorts of questions out as well.
Later,
- Felicia
More information about the Cadre-politics
mailing list