[CSL board] mvhub.com lowellevents.info
Dan MacNeil
dan at thecsl.org
Mon Apr 14 10:53:49 EDT 2008
Here's an item for Wednesday's executive committee meeting...
We're been applying for grants to make mvhub.com skinnable and
plugable. When we're done, people could use mvhub software with
different colors and logos or (more important) share the database
with us. When the "please update your listing" email goes out, it
would be to update a bunch of directories.
We don't have to be greedy about our share of poverty and
ignorance. More selfishily We have a better chance of getting
funding for our software and data [***] if it is used around the
country by 100s of groups. There are a lots of crappy
directories. The directory owners cling to them because the
organization gets funding or recognition. Improving these
directories is a better strategy than crushing them.
A week or so ago, I met w/ Miran Fernandez, CIO of city of
Lowell. He's working on something like mvhub.com implemented in
MS sharepoint. He's a little uneasy about anything not
controlled by the city's IT dept and an official city thing with
advertising.
We've agreed to start work on sharing a back-end. We're not sure
if it will be via SQL or CSV dumps or web services, or smoke
signals.
We also know that before we go live, we need a memo of
understanding.
So far so, good, the above should not be a big surprise to anyone
on the board. The new twist is combining lowellevents.info and
calendar.mvhub.com
Miran is proposing that we fold http:/calendar.mvhub.com into a
community calendar at http://lowellevents.info
To contribute to Wednesday's discussion you should probably look
at both calendars.
The city would host the calendar and we (CSL) would be
responsible for reviewing / approving events. We'd not get paid
for this, but we're not getting paid (much) to do this now.
The calendar needs spam and wack-job filtering, but it would be
awkward for the city to be responsible for moderating political
announcements.
PROS FOR CSL
We'd not have to maintain calendar software. This isn't huge as
we're maintaining calendars for other groups anyway.
We'd get some good will from Miran and the city.
CONS FOR CSL
We'd lose some mindshare/credit.
We'd lose opportunity for advertising revenue (right now a
$200/year opportunity)
We'd be supporting proprietary software.
PRO FOR CITY
More mindshare / glory for IT dept
Not much more work.
PRO FOR COMMMUNITY
One stop shopping for calendar needs.
CON FOR COMMUNITY
A little transition / redirect hassle
[***] The copyright for most of the software is held by LTC. It
is however licensed under the GPL, which means as long as we
contribute our changes back, we can use it freely. The data is
also copyright LTC, but like the phone book, a collection of
facts is not copyright-able. The domain name is held by LTC, and
that is absolutely theirs.
LTC paid us $2,000 for software and data maintenance,
08-2007/08-2008
Relations with LTC are great these days.
More information about the Divinerightofkings
mailing list